deviant art

Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]
more ▶

Featured in Groups:

Details

February 27, 2007
Link
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 30
Favourites: 0
Views: 271 (0 today)
[x]

ACADEMY AWARDS FOR 2006

Tue Feb 27, 2007, 5:04 PM
  • Mood: Approval
  • Listening to: Mixed Music from iTunes
  • Reading: An Elmore Leonard novel
  • Watching: Battlestar Galactica (Season Two)
With this online art community, we have a unique opportunity to connect with our kindred. We must avail ourselves of this experience, for it may never come again.

Congratulations to director George Miller, and Warner Bros for winning the Academy Award for Best Animated Feature of the Year, with HAPPY FEET!

Well done!  They managed to best the giant, Pixar.  Well deserved, since I personally feel CARS is Pixar's weakest effort to date.  And HAPPY FEET out-charms, and also highlights a more important cause.   Route 66 rocks, but Penguins rule!  LOL!

And CONGRATULATIONS to Torill Kove for winning the Academy Award for Best Animated Short Film of the Year, with THE DANISH POET!

KUDOS!  In a category and industry now heavily laden with over-produced digital animation, this traditionally rendered, simplistically beautiful work proves that an important animation method is NOT dead, and can still achieve amidst an increasingly technical landscape.   May this give some hope to so many brilliant veteran and younger animators who feel threatened that their beloved art form is obsolete.  I say 'art form' since the continual "exclusivity" of digital production has so unfairly distanced hand-drawn animation within its own genre.

I'd rather think that Technology merely kills its own.  Each new machine replaces the older model, leaving the Purpose inviolate.  I'm less disturbed by the obsoletion of Rotoscoping, or Film Photography (even with their elements of remarkable creativity) than I am with Technology callously and unwisely supplanting a more intimate artistic expression.

As I've said, the STORY is the heart of any great work, and there are many tools in the box with which to tell the story.  Tell the story well enough, and it really shouldn't matter which tools we use.  But why ignore the still-worthy pencil, pen, and brush in order to devote oneself to a computer?

Balance.

You are the artist, whether animator, or illustrator.  Select what canvas on which to paint.  And express yourself with your heart's desire, your mind's imagination, and ALL the instruments within the reach of your fingertips.

Add a Comment:
 
:iconnachosncheese:
OH yeah. I forgot. For the animated short films, I never did see the Danish Poet. I guess I'll have to now. But it must have been fabulous, if it beat out the Little Match(stick?) Girl. I fell in love with that after watching it. :aww:
Reply
:iconld6:
well said, well said. THe story is everything and I wish a few more movies would take that to heart, but on the flip side, It makes the good ones that much better. HAPPY FEET definitely deserved the oscar, XD, great movie.
Reply
:iconjennikins:
Although I cannot comment on the story content of Happy Feet, I have seen Cars though and did enjoy that and do agree with your comments regarding it as a bit weak for what Pixar usually delivers, I have a bit of a gripe with the industry and it's use of motion capure. I fear that studios will get the idea that they can do it faster and cheaper and films become more computer generated instead of computer animated. In the same way that they neglected classical animation with the dawn of computer animation. In order not to take anything away from films like Cars or Happy Feet (i still want to see it), perhaps the Academy should look at having two separate catagories, one for feature animation and one for feature cartoons (meaning no mo-cap). As both can tell good...or bad stories, but it would be nice to preserve cartoons as their own medium before they get lost to technology, or forgotton.
Reply
:icontonydennison:
*TonyDennison Feb 28, 2007  Professional General Artist
Considering the current fluctuation in the market as new media platforms are cropping up all the time; as well as the fragmentation of the traditional venues (theatre, television) by the internet and new big media players (like Mark Cuban, who want to release films simultaneously on the web, dvd and theatre) -- I’m inclined to suspect that the truly “visionary” work in the next few years is going to come from outside the system.

Even films like Happy Feet (which I haven’t seen yet), co-opted the trend in many films to feature penguins (March of the Penguins seemed to get that ball rolling) as well as the environmental consciousness component, which is always applauded as long as it’s not done in a preaching or finger-pointing manner.

If my assertion is true--I’m glad. I think this is the best time to be a creative individual, rarely does innovation come from the top down anyway and it’s even rarer that it has the financial backing to reach the largest audience possible.

The web has changed all that.
Reply
:iconjerome-k-moore:
*Jerome-K-Moore Feb 28, 2007  Professional Filmographer
Yes, indeed. The Internet is both boon and bane. We are enjoying the blessings primarily. We must await the full weight of the malediction.
Reply
:icontonydennison:
*TonyDennison Mar 1, 2007  Professional General Artist
Does an ill-wind approach?
Reply
:iconjerome-k-moore:
*Jerome-K-Moore Mar 1, 2007  Professional Filmographer
Whoever smelt it, dealt it! LOL!!
Reply
:icontonydennison:
*TonyDennison Feb 28, 2007  Professional General Artist
That last question is about the Swedish short film.
Reply
:iconjerome-k-moore:
*Jerome-K-Moore Feb 28, 2007  Professional Filmographer
Typical Hollywood, running to whever lightning has already struck, with hopes to capture it in a bottle. Yes, it escapes no one's notice that there's a distasteful similarity among much of the animated fare on the market, replete with the same recycled gutter-humor, topical references, and sassy catch-phrases. Most are the misbegotten progeny of Pixar, Dreamworks' SHREK, and Blue Sky's ICE AGE. The success of these has spawned inferior copycats ad nauseum. But I believe CARS was in development far in advance of any strategic decision to stand out from the critter crowd. It was just a premise without enough promise. A confectionary concoction that was a little undercooked. C'est la vie.

No, I haven't yet had the privilege of seeing THE DANISH POET. I wish animated shorts were more accessible in theaters, and more openly marketed along with any full-length features they would be attached to. I know it's all a money matter. What isn't? But I wish we could dispense with all of the over-aggressive advertising of sponsors and products. It's gone too far. Bring back the theater experience of years past, where the animated shorts preceded the main presentation more dependably. I'm sure I can get an "Amen" here at DA. Just not on Madison Avenue.

Thanks, Tony.
Reply
:iconredlina:
Who's showing off now? :evileye: I could add 'toujours parchive' there but that would be pushing it, wouldn't it? ;)

You know, they could've had time to present all the shorts properly. At least I think they would. But I guess guests would've been bored.
:shakefish: (because you can't find a bloody :rollseyes: emoticon; and this one's funny ;P)
Reply
Add a Comment: