DeviantART is counting down to its 100 millionth deviation! Join in on the fun and take a look back at some of the most noteworthy deviations we've seen along the way. The deviant who uploads the 100 millionth deviation could win a special prize, too. Hurry, we're going to hit the 100 million mark soon!














Comments
--
Serendipity is...
...the song you were thinking of coming up on your iPod shuffle...
...happening upon a mirror that shows your heart's desire...
...the faculty of making fortunate discoveries by accident. ---Harry/Hermione
--
Clouseau: I would like to take at your bawls
Larocque: My what?
Clouseau: Your bawls, I would like to take a look at your big, brass bawls
I am Simba in the =The-Disney-Directory
--
Daffy: We gotta get new agents we're getting screwed! -Space Jam
I Luv dat line
_
Proud Member of:
~LooneyTunes & ~Pokeshippers
I command you to join:
*Bugs-LolaClub PLEASE?
--
"For it's out of the darkness that we learn to see and out of the silence that songs come to be." < David Friedman.
>> As we advance in age we know less and less; we know everything when we're toddlers; we know so little when we're old and weary <<
My personal, unsolicited opinion was that the most important thing was that the art be recognizable to the public. And since there was already an established style (that of Mary Grandpré), approved by the creator, WB should've paid that artist to furnish new illustrations, or pay for the rights to copy her style. This was a costly proposition, and obviously disregarded. THEN along came the films, and the potentiality of the marketplace being flooded with THREE competing Potter styles. Their stance became untenable, and they finally yielded. They agreed to hire Ms. Grandpré, as well as another artist to mimic her style, and the in-house style was abandoned, after LOTS of expense.
Whether the abandoned art was appealing or not (and most of it wasn't) was not relevant in the larger scheme. We were saddled with an art style that was neither tied to the top-selling books, nor able to now compete with the stunning visuals of the films. It was a pointless and costly blunder, serving only corporate greed and pride. At least, that's how I saw it, but then I never understood the logic they were using. They tried to apply the same logic to HAPPY FEET, and in the end, Mumble was branded with a yellow bowtie. Believe me, it was going to be a LOT worse!
--
"Beware the beast Man, for he is the Devil's pawn. Alone among God's primates, he kills for sport or lust or greed... Shun him; drive him back into his jungle lair, for he is the harbinger of death."
Still, the art you produce for WB's publicity is still a helluva lot nicer than most PR art that comes out of Disney. Christ, it's awful stuff, especially of the princesses and DVD cover design....
Well, I've made this observation regarding my IRON GIANT art. It was a tedious ordeal to render something that was animated digitally. But the technology used for a film is often unavailable for product art, so it is necesitated that new poses be rendered in other ways. Waiting for screen-grabs is never optimum. I really shouldn't complain, since this gave ME something to do. lol
But yes, the standard of quality is unfortunately inconsistent. Sadly, it was pointed out by a fellow Deviant here that "package art" doesn't matter anyway, and that the consumer merely cares about what's inside the "wrapper." I was one of the few illustrators that endeavored to do the best work I could, no matter the application, or lack of appreciation.
--
"Beware the beast Man, for he is the Devil's pawn. Alone among God's primates, he kills for sport or lust or greed... Shun him; drive him back into his jungle lair, for he is the harbinger of death."
--
My Website>>> [link]
"Do you have any belts made from gecko skins? Is the meat suitable for fondu?" -Randy
My lovely icon is made by *DeviantPanda
Previous Page123Next Page